Prediction of Jeremy Beale [821st] vs Blake Mott [476th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
W L L W W W L W W LH2H: Beale 1 - 1 Mott
They have played 6 sets in total, with Beale winning 3 and Mott winning 3. The last match between Beale and Mott was at the M25 Cairns, 06-10-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jeremy Beale getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeremy Beale | 1 |
| Blake Mott | 1 |
| Beale | Stats | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 821 | Ranking | 476 |
| 459 | Highest Rank | 220 |
| 30 | Age | 28 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 5 |
| 57% (139-105) | Career Total W/L | 57% (253-189) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $133,500 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Jeremy Beale
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jeremy Beale
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
0
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 33 | Games Won | 31 |
| 22 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 2:52:0 | Average Match Time | 2:52:0 |
| 62% (128/208) | 1st Serve % | 70% (135/194) |
| 69% (88/128) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (97/135) |
| 50% (40/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (19/59) |
| 44% (8/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (7/21) |
| 40% (78/194) | Return Points Win % | 38% (80/208) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeremy Beale vs Blake Mott Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Beale 1 - 1 Mott
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beale has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mott has won 41.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beale, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mott has won 49.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beale has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mott has saved 50.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beale has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mott winning 57.58% (W/L 38/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beale has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 109/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 215/ 146), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Beale winning 1 times and Mott being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Beale winning 3 and Mott winning 3. The last match between Beale and Mott was at the M25 Cairns, 06-10-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jeremy Beale getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beale and Mott have played a deciding set 2 times, with Beale winning 1 times and Mott 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Beale winning 0, and Mott 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beale has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mott has played against players with an average rank of 241.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beale has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mott has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beale has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mott has converted 38.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jeremy Beale vs Blake Mott Best Odds For The Match
Jeremy Beale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jake Delaney
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Pavle Marinkov
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Kokoro Isomura
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jeremy Beale
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
0
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jacob Brumm
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Thomas Fancutt
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Jeremy Beale
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Blake Mott
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Matisse Bobichon
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
73%
(
83 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
88 of
141)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
12
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
62 of
141)
131
Total Points Won
124
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Mert Alkaya
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
6 of
11)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
20
Total Points Won
19
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dinko Dinev
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Blake Mott
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dennis Novak
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Beale vs Mott?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Beale Vs Mott is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (139/105) | Win/Loss | 57% (253/189) |
| 56% (304/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (566/438) |
| 52% (2593/2380) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4923/4425) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 773 | Aces Total | 925 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 580 | Total Double Faults | 1160 |
| 1:9:12 | Average Match Time | 1:13:4 |
| 223.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 188.57 |
| 66% (8380/12649) | 1st Serve % | 68% (14723/21659) |
| 67% (5615/8380) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10060/14723) |
| 49% (2091/4267) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3344/6936) |
| 42% (511/1208) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1032/2338) |
| 40% (4870/12305) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9045/21837) |
| 59% (137/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (250/434) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (29/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (61/111) |
| 59% (34/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (64/126) |
| 86% (143/123) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (254/220) |
| 14% (143/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (254/33) |
| 16% (101/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (188/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
